Evaluation of Cotton Yield, Quality, and Plant Growth Response to Soil-Applied Potassium

The frequency and severity of potassium (K) deficiency symptoms in cotton have increased in some soils in the US Cotton Belt over the past decade or so. Insufficient levels plant available K in these regions are likely decreasing yields and fiber quality and leading to decrease profits for cotton producers.

IPNI-2015-USA-101

02 Jun 2018

2017 Annual Interpretive Summary


Potassium (K) plays a key role in several critical cotton plant processes, including photosynthesis, activation of protein enzymes, disease and drought stress mitigation, and fiber development. Across the United States Cotton Belt, K deficiency symptoms in cotton have increased over the past decade, which may be reducing lint yield and fiber quality in these areas. In 2015 a project was initiated at 12 locations across the Cotton Belt with the objectives of: 1) quantifying soil K concentrations (at depth) from major cotton production regions in the Cotton Belt experiencing K deficiencies; and 2) evaluating the impact of K application methods and rates on cotton lint yield, quality, and economic return on investment (ROI). Based on these results, the goal was to re-evaluate soil K recommendations and modify as appropriate to optimize yields. Both granular (0-0-60) and liquid (0-0-15) muriate of potash (KCl) sources of K were applied two to four weeks prior to planting cotton at rates of 0, 40, 80, 120, and 160 lb/A K2O. In 2016, trial locations were divided, with nine being designated as new sites meaning that a new field location was selected each year of the study (Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Texas - Lubbock and Williamson Counties, and Virginia).

Discussion of results will include soil macronutrient concentrations at depths of 0 to 6”, 6 to 12”, and 12 to 24” and cotton lint yield. Locations other than Texas and Oklahoma generally had soil K concentrations less than 150 mg/kg (critical level of K, Mehlich 3), and as such, a yield response to applied K fertilizer was expected. In 2015 and 2016, a significant treatment effect was determined at three locations. Two of those, Williamson County, Texas, and Virginia, had lower yields than most other locations. A positive lint yield response to knife-injected K fertilizer (0-0-15) was measured in 2015 at the Lubbock County location. Inconsistent yield responses at locations with limited soil K or with soil K concentrations well above the critical level indicate that K dynamics in cotton are not well understood and deserve continued investigation.